<html>
<head>
<style>
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Verdana
}
</style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
Thanks for getting back to me :) <br>Hmm, I totally did forget to send this to the vtkusers list...<br><br>At any rate, if anyone else has any ideas or tried this (even with some conversions) I'd love to know.<br><br>Thanks again :)<br><br>> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 22:58:46 +0900<br>> To: Renegade0001@hotmail.com<br>> CC: hhiraki@lab.nig.ac.jp<br>> Subject: Re: GTS Wrapper?<br>> From: hhiraki@lab.nig.ac.jp<br>> <br>> Hi :)<br>> <br>> At Tue, 21 Jul 2009 10:21:13 -0700, Renegade0001@hotmail.com wrote:<br>> > First off, thanks very much for the code - I should be able to convert both vtkpolydata meshes to GtsSurfaces, run their boolean difference/union/intersection routines, then convert them back with this :) Is that the type of operation that you were using these functions for?<br>> <br>> Yes. It worked, though it was not perfect for degenerated cases.<br>> <br>> > Regarding the "wrapper" I was actually hoping that someone had re-written some gts code to use vtkpolydata objects rather than GtsSurfaces to speed things up and avoid converting... I'll likely be giving this a go later on in my thesis, but I figured if someone has attempted it already, it would save some serious time.<br>> <br>> I think some conversion is inevitable, because the array-based, <br>> compact data structure of vtkPolyData and the pointer-based, <br>> editable data structure of GTS surface were designed differently.<br>> <br>> > Anyway, thanks again for the code and if anyone else has done anything toward integrating GTS and VTK, please let us know!<br>> <br>> Did you forget to send this to the vtkusers list?<br>> <br>> Regards,<br>> <br>> Hideaki Hiraki<br><br /><hr />More storage. Better anti-spam and antivirus protection. <a href='http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9671352' target='_new'>Hotmail makes it simple.</a></body>
</html>